But there are a lot of people in the wealthier countries, I wouldn’t describe them as lazy, but they’re not super motivated. They think they can more or less get by. I think in relative terms those people are already starting to see lower wages because they’re just not quite the prize commodities they think they are. They’ll do okay. They’ll be able to get jobs, but they’re not really individuals who are going to see a lot of income growth, and I think this could be a rude awakening to a lot of people.
Lo tengo fichado y en mi lista. Hace unos días estuve a punto de tarer el siguiente texto a este café:
Yesterday Edward Hugh wrote an intriguing passage: Despite the fact that Spain’s unemployment rate is currently around 27% immigrants continue to arrive in the country (often risking their lives to do so), a fact which puzzled the Financial Times demography correspondent Norma Cohen when we spoke about this article. “Why on earth,” she asked me “would people want to come to Spain with such a high rate of unemployment?” Because salaries are better than in their home countries would be the simple answer, and because they are willing to do work which many Spaniards are reluctant to do, at least at the salaries which are on offer. So economic migrants continue to arrive, an estimated 300,000 of them last year, even though the net migrant flow reversed since more left (both native Spaniards and immigrants) with Spain’s population falling for the first time in modern history as a result.
Lo que dice ahí Cowen sobre los salarios está muy bien. Pero tengan cuidado con muchas otras cosas que escribe.
Háganme caso: el principio de equimarginalidad de los factores no hay por dónde agarrarlo. No se puede utilizar la teoría de la productividad marginal como una teoría de la distribución.
La "pars destruens" del legado de Piero Sraffa es inexpugnable.
El caracol relacionado con la lluvia y con la luna.Blando y duro como una quimera,con cuernos como la serpiente en Mesopotamia ,ocupando el lugar del dragón y del caos frente a San Jorge ... María
But there are a lot of people in the wealthier countries, I wouldn’t describe them as lazy, but they’re not super motivated. They think they can more or less get by. I think in relative terms those people are already starting to see lower wages because they’re just not quite the prize commodities they think they are. They’ll do okay. They’ll be able to get jobs, but they’re not really individuals who are going to see a lot of income growth, and I think this could be a rude awakening to a lot of people.
ResponderEliminarAverage is over
¿Tyler Cowen?
EliminarBingo
EliminarCowen es el corresponsable de esta página.
Eliminarhttp://marginalrevolution.com/
Por cierto, cita mucho a Strauss (great minds think alike) y hoy mismo recomienda el libro de Tanguay.
Lo tengo fichado y en mi lista. Hace unos días estuve a punto de tarer el siguiente texto a este café:
EliminarYesterday Edward Hugh wrote an intriguing passage:
Despite the fact that Spain’s unemployment rate is currently around 27% immigrants continue to arrive in the country (often risking their lives to do so), a fact which puzzled the Financial Times demography correspondent Norma Cohen when we spoke about this article. “Why on earth,” she asked me “would people want to come to Spain with such a high rate of unemployment?” Because salaries are better than in their home countries would be the simple answer, and because they are willing to do work which many Spaniards are reluctant to do, at least at the salaries which are on offer. So economic migrants continue to arrive, an estimated 300,000 of them last year, even though the net migrant flow reversed since more left (both native Spaniards and immigrants) with Spain’s population falling for the first time in modern history as a result.
Lo que dice ahí Cowen sobre los salarios está muy bien. Pero tengan cuidado con muchas otras cosas que escribe.
EliminarHáganme caso: el principio de equimarginalidad de los factores no hay por dónde agarrarlo. No se puede utilizar la teoría de la productividad marginal como una teoría de la distribución.
La "pars destruens" del legado de Piero Sraffa es inexpugnable.
Don Karl, tiene usted razón: no sé por dónde agarrar el principio de equimarginalidad. ¡Qué gran palabro, por cierto!
EliminarMe ha hecho usted reír con mi pedantería... Buena cosa.
EliminarDe la edad media nos ha quedado el underground y como decía aquel solo los monjes medievales savemos la verdad.
ResponderEliminarEl caracol relacionado con la lluvia y con la luna.Blando y duro como una quimera,con cuernos como la serpiente en Mesopotamia ,ocupando el lugar del dragón y del caos frente a San Jorge ...
ResponderEliminarMaría